Sunday, 12 April 2009

The joys of old books

At a second-hand book sale I found a 1944 Penguin edition of Conrad's 'Twixt land and Sea, a collection of three short stories, comprising 'A Smile of Fortune,' 'The Secret Sharer' and 'Freya of the Seven Isles.'

The book itself is absolutely gorgeous, one of those old orange penguins with the white band across the middle. The spine advises this is number 447 in the series. The book proudly declares it price to have been Ninepence. That's Ninepence, mind you, not nine pence or 9p or even the old fashioned 9d.

Even better, on the back, where nowadays you'd get a misleadingly enticing blurb, there is a charming advertisment for Greys (sic) Cigarettes, described as "Just honest to goodness tobacco." This is accompanied by a picture of a military type in one of those gigantic bearskin helments worn by the likes of the Coldstream guards. It is noticeable that he is not smoking tobacco, honest or otherwise.

Inside the front cover is an advert for "Service shoes by Lotus - specialists in regulation footwear." Inside the back cover is an advert for Mars Bars - "Nothing but the finest ingredients is good enough for Mars." We are warned, however, that "Zoning now restricts Mars to the Southern Counties. So here's hoping for a quick victory - and plenty of Mars for everyone - everywhere." Beat the Hun so the free world can enjoy Mars Bars once again ... And one of the leafs at the back carries a promotion for Cadbury's.

Given that this book cost me nothing, effectively ("Take this box, fill it with as many books as you like for $5.") the amount of pleasure I've gained simply from caressing its battered cover and smiling at its quaint adverts (a practice that needs to be revived) is positively indecent.

Saturday, 11 April 2009

There goes April

Amazing how time passes when you aren't doing anything cuseful with it. I've been busy Not Writing for the first ten days of the month. First, I had monstrous tooth ache. My dentist has gleefully informed me I've an abssess on the nerve and the only option is to rip the tooth out. I've been swallowing a patchwork of drugs to keep the pain under control untilt he oral surgeons return from holiday. Meanwhile, an old friend is In Country, and since I hadn't seen him for about ten years, and he has never met my children, it was essential to catch up with him. So I haven't really been thinking too much about writing, and now we're a third of the way through the month and tonight is the first night I've written anything 1,000 words on Scratches, 500 words on Traces.

On the plus side, I've had a beast of an idea for ANOTHER story, completely seperate from the two above. I'll keep it in reserve in case I get stuck on either of them. It would be a children's novel, and set in a not-too-distant future. The title and the first line came to me in a bit of a blinding flash type thing while I was mowing the lawn. I spent the next half hour repeating them over and over to myself, lest I forget them. Pretty securely lodged in my head now.

Just amazing how ideas come blasting in, once you start writing.
Traces - 14,574
Scratches - 5,362

Friday, 3 April 2009

The Seventh Scroll by Wilbur Smith

Unless I do something really stupid, like read another book by Patricia Cornwell , then Wilbur Smith's The Seventh Scroll is going to be my worst read of the year (1). In fact, I can only think of two books I have disliked to the same degree - Melvyn Bragg's Credo and Iris Murdoch's The Bell. Wilbur Smith being compared to Iris Murdoch? Truly, strange bedfellows.

Where to start with The Seventh Scroll? First things: its length. Size isn't everything, but when we're talking about truly, reprehensibly bad writing, dull plotting and cardboard characters, then size suddenly becomes very important. The Seventh Scroll has a lot of size, a harrowing 486 pages. Bricks are smaller, and more readable.

You know when you read a book, and you bounce down the first page, all Bambi enthusiasm, waiting to get hooked in, to become fascinated by the characters or the sweep of the story or the intracy of the plot or the way that the writer batters new stuff out of the English language? That is what I was like with this book. I thought I should read something by Wilbur Smith, as I've been snottily turning up my nose at his books for years. Fair play compelled me to see if my high brow derision was merited - Hell's bells, I am alimp wristed liberal and believe in all hose fine principles like innocent until proven guilty. I was doing this man wrong by prejudging him. I also have a lemming-like streak, which I mentioned before in relation to Patricia Cornwell, that makes me make intermittently misguided reading choices in an attempt to bond with the common folk. Never, ever again. Until I read The Da Vinci Code, at least.

But, anyway, about the bloody book. All right, so it is big. The plot and the characters are hopeless. Rider Haggard did this sort of thing 10,000 times better, long, long ago. Save yourself the ordeal and re-read King Solomon's Mines. It is shorter and better.

Briefly: Royan, half English, half Egyptian and very hot, survives a savage assault that leaves her elderly Arabic husband dead. they were working on an archaelogical project relating to the mysterious seventh scroll, which might locate the lost tomb of Pharaoh Momose. She seeks help from a dashing English adventurer type, and together they locate the tomb in the face of opposition from the nefarious types - the ringleader is of course German - Hell bent on their destruction.

None of this would be terribly bad if it wasn't so drabbly written. I think it was about page 6 or 7 that warning bells started ringing, when the elderly Duraid is murdered. It was just horribly flat, badly paced, lacking tension. I was suddenly struck by a longing to read an Haggardian adventure story writen by Ian MacEwan. Think how much fun that would be. Or pretty much anything else. But not, never, another word by Wilbur Smith.

Never the less, I ploughed on. Royan flees Egypt and enlists the help of the aforementioned adventurer. He is - get this - an authentic English aristocrat, complete with double barrelled name (Sir Nicholas Quenton-Harper. Not Quentin, you understand, but Quenton) who delights in shooting game birds and rare antelope but still styles himself a 'conservationist' - which means that he winces at the thought of cutting down ancient trees but doesn't actually not cut them down. Sir Nick is a gentleman, which means he doesn't shag Royan, though she does allow him to get to to fool around a little bit more than is ladylike, which is probably down to her hot Arab blood. Everyone else is at it, of course, especially the black characters, who are portrayed various as foolish, lazy, stupid, drunk or horny. And there is an evil Russian as well, who we know is evil because he debases his woman. And the aforementioned evil German mastermind, who is also, naturally, sexually deviant.

Crude, offensive stereotypes aside (did I forget the sleazy, untrustworthy Arab?), the novel is very badly written. Characters talk - and think - in fully, uncontracted, non-colloquial language, no matter how grim the circumstances. Since Smith has already got plenty of words he should have been merciful and spared us a few by allowing his characters to say "Don't" instead of "Do not." I am sure Roayn and Nick were very well raised, but surely even they would have used the odd contraction especially when fleeing for their lives for the umpteenth time?

There is one almost-good joke in the book. Wilbur Smith puts himself in it as a character, referred to as a writer of books redolent with sex and violence. As a passing wink this might have worked, but he decides to hammer home the point by repeating it several times, perhaps feeling his readers are too thick to get it. More likely, they are simply comatose.

Beneath the smug author photograph inside the dust jacket, I am told that Smith dedicated his last 20 novels to his wife Danielle. If they are all of this quality, then she should be insulted.

NO STARS
1 - The year in question was actually 2005. This review was posted on an MSN book review group, that has since been deleted. It is reproduced here because I'm very fond of the gleeful viciousness of it. God, I hate that book.

Wednesday, 1 April 2009

Goals for April

Pretty straightforward:
Traces to 25K, meaning 11,000 words need to be added.
Scratches to 15K, again, meaning about 11,000 words.
Not very ambitious targets - 500 words on each, every night for about three weeks. But manageable, and if reached, both books should be well established, and hopefully not turning into nanosludge.

Oh, and I'm taking tonight off.